Many people say that our education system is broken. It's not. Our
system of education is obsolete. What may have made sense one hundred
years ago no longer makes sense today.
One hundred years ago college didn't matter. Maybe for bragging rights,
but not for getting a job. People lived in the same town their entire
lives. Everyone knew everyone else and anyone could vouch for you. It
was a network; the most advanced form of social organization.
With the advent of modern transportation, people were no longer fixed.
After the first world war, people could live anywhere they wanted, and
increasingly they did. No one knew anyone and so no one could vouch for
you. Transportation and surpassed our social support systems. Colleges
saw this and stepped up to plate as the trusted middleman, and so we
regressed from networks to hierarchies.
This wasn't necessarily bad in and of itself. Hierarchies can be
efficient too. Corporations are usually hierarchies, and they are one
of our most adaptive social systems.
Things got bad when credentialism surpassed education as the primary
function of college. If you want evidence of this, consider the
criteria for the US News & World Report college rankings: Peer
assessment, student selectivity, faculty resources, graduation and
retention rate, financial resources, alumni giving, and graduation rate
performance. Notice anything missing?
Are colleges not ranked in order of how much students learn because
that would be impossible to measure? Or is it because no one cares?
As the old saying goes, "What gets measured gets done." According to the National Adult Literacy Survey, 71% of college graduates are unable to read proficiently. What exactly is getting done?
Colleges have failed. Credentialism has failed. Hierarchies have failed.
And they haven't just failed abstractly or in general. They've failed
me personally.
The good news is that, thanks to the Internet, degrees may be on their way
out. The Internet, as the name suggests, is a global network. Everyone
is connected to everyone else. I'm connected to every fortune 500 CEO
within one degree. So are you. Sounds a lot like pre-WWI society
doesn't it?
Recruiters rely on degrees because they are the easiest way to grok
what someone is all about. The problem is that relying on credentialism
is an act of faith, comparable to closed source eVoting without a paper
trail. And we all know what that got us. The Internet is changing this.
Every year our lives become more transparent as our words and actions
become increasingly digitized and searchable. What credentialism was to
the twentieth century, Google will be to the 21st.
In the 20th century your references were something you put on your resume. In the 21st century your references ARE your resume.
Thanks to the Internet I am connected with almost every CEO within two
degrees. It's as if we all live in a small village again, where
everyone knows everyone and anyone can vouch for you. Hierarchies are
no longer necessary, because hyperlinks have subverted them.
As technology multiplies, new social systems and metaphors will emerge as others obsolesce. Only humanity remains untouched.